#ipkenya Weekly Dozen: 25/05

Africa people map

  • In Cannes, African filmmakers are plotting to take back control from European producers [Quartz]
  • CC Africa Community Collaborates on Continental Projects [Creative Commons]
  • Ghana becomes the 38th country to join the Marrakesh Treaty [Official]
  • Ethiopian Government to sue Dutch Company that patented teff grain [The Reporter]
  • The clock ticks towards General Data Protection Regulation for African companies [Nairobi Business Monthly]
  • South Africa Intellectual Property (IP) Policy-Phase 1 approved [Official]
  • Kenyan Film agencies clash in new licence fees row [Business Daily]
  • Eveready ruling keeps away rivals [Nation]
  • Kenya Income Tax Bill 2018 has new provisions on IP between associated persons [Treasury]
  • ARIPO Working Group Clarifies Fees Deadlines [Adams & Adams]
  • Kenya moves to regulate fintech-fuelled lending craze [Reuters]
  • TAMING THE INTERNET: The good, the bad and the ugly parts of the Kenya Computer Misuse and Cybercrimes Act 2018 [The Elephant]

For more news stories and developments, please check out #ipkenya on twitter and feel free to share any other intellectual property-related items that you may come across.

Happy Africa Day!

 

Advertisements

Kenya’s Computer Misuse and Cybercrimes Bill Signed into Law

Uhuru Kenyatta signs Computer Misuse and Cybercrimes Bill into law 16 May 2018

On 16 May 2018, President Uhuru Kenyatta (pictured above) assented to the Computer Misuse and Cybercrimes Bill, 2018. The Bill was passed by the National Assembly on 26 April 2018. Readers of this blog will note that, unlike the previous Computer and Cybercrimes Bill, 2017 that was first tabled in Parliament, the Act now contains some new provisions relating to blockchain, mobile money, offences related to cybersquatting, electronic messages, revenge porn, identity theft and impersonation, as well as the newly created National Computer and Cybercrimes Coordination Committee. A copy of the Act is available here.

From an intellectual property (IP) perspective, the Act is significant for several reasons, including that it creates new offences and prescribes penalties related to cyber-infringements, it regulates jurisdiction, as well as the powers to investigate search and gain access to or seize items in relation to cybercrimes. It also regulates aspects of electronic evidence, relative to cybercrimes as well as aspects of international cooperation in respect to investigations of cybercrimes. Finally it creates several stringent obligations and requirements for service providers. Continue reading